Hyperemic Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Provides the Hemodynamic Outcome for Moderate to Severe Coronary Artery Stenoses

Yoshishige Kanamori, Fumitsugu Yoshikawa, Ryuichi Aikawa

Abstract


Background: The fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been established as a physiological tool for the assessment of coronary ischemia. The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is an alternative pressure-derived physiologic index from the diastolic wave-free period in stable conditions. The hyperemic iFR (h-iFR) may represent a diagnostic tool; however, its diagnostic performance is unclear. Thus, we aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of the h-iFR compared with the conventional whole-cycle FFR.

Methods: Fifty consecutive lesions, which were diagnosed as 50-75% stenosis by coronary angiography, were analyzed regarding the h-iFR and FFR during the intravenous administration of adenosine using a pressure wire. The h-iFR and FFR were calculated via automated algorithms.

Results: Twenty-two stenoses were positive (FFR ≦0.8), and 28 stenoses were negative (FFR >0.8). The slope of the regression line was 1.28 in the positive group and 1.61 in the negative group. The FFR and h-iFR values ranged from 0.64 to 0.80 (0.75±0.04) and 0.52 to 0.82 (0.66±0.07), respectively, in the positive group and 0.81 to 1.02 (0.90±0.05) and 0.69 to 1.02 (0.87±0.08), respectively, in the negative group. The means of the differences between the FFR and h-iFR were 0.027 and 0.090 in the FFR positive and negative groups, respectively.

Conclusions: The hyperemic iFR, which is calculated using the diastolic phase and exhibited a larger dynamic range than the FFR, especially in FFR-positive stenosis, may be a better physiological tool than the cardiac full-cycle FFR in the evaluation of coronary ischemia.



Full Text:

PDF

References


Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, Van Der Voort PH, Bonnier HJ, Bartunek J, Koolen JJ. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1703-1708.

Pijls NH, Sels JW. Functional measurement of coronary stenosis JACC 2012;59:1045–1057.

De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Jüni P. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI. N Engl J Med 2015;372:95.

Tanaka N, Takazawa K, Shindo N, Kobayashi H, Teramoto T, Yamashita J, Yamashina A. Decrease of fractional flow reserve shortly after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ J 2006;70:1327-1331.

De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, Barbato E, Tonino P, Piroth Z, Jagic N, Mobius-Winckler S, Rioufol G, Witt N and others. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1208-1217.

Abe M, Tomiyama H, Yoshida H, Doba N. Diastolic fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of moderate coronary artery stenoses: comparison with fractional flow reserve and coronary flow velocity reserve. Circulation 2000;102:2365-2370.

Chalyan D, Zhang Z, Takarada S, Molloi S. End-diastolic fractional flow reserve: comparison with conventional full-cardiac cycle fractional flow reserve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:28-34.

Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, Mikhail GW, Foale RA, Mila R, Tarkin J, Petraco R, Broyd C, Jabbour R and others. Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1392-1402.

Petraco R, Escaned J, Sen S, Nijjer S, Asrress KN, Echavarria-Pinto M, Lockie T, Khawaja MZ, Cuevas C, Foin N and others. Classification performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve in a clinical population of intermediate coronary stenoses: results of the ADVISE registry. EuroIntervention 2013;9:91-101.

Park JJ, Petraco R, Nam CW, Doh JH, Davies J, Escaned J, Koo B. Clinical validation of the resting pressure parameters in the assessment of functionally significant coronary stenosis; results of an independent, blinded comparison with fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:4070-4075.

Tanaka N, Takazawa K, Takeda K, Aikawa M, Shindo N, Amaya K, Kobori Y, Yamashina A. Coronary flow--pressure relationship distal to epicardial stenosis. Circ J 2003;67:525-529.

Nijjer SS, Sen S, Petraco R, Mayet J, Francis DP, Davies JE. The Instantaneous wave-Free Ratio (iFR) pullback: a novel innovation using baseline physiology to optimise coronary angioplasty in tandem lesions. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2015;16:167-171.

Gould KL. Pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenoses in unsedated dogs at rest and during coronary vasodilation. Circ Res 1978;43:242-253.

Sen S, Asrress K, Nijjer S, Petraco R, Malik I, Foale R, Mikhail G, Foin N, Broyd C, Hadjiloizou N and others. Diagnostic classification of the instantaneous wave-free ratio is equivalent to fractional flow reserve and is not improved with adenosine administration. Results of CLARIFY (Classification Accuracy of Pressure-Only Ratios Against Indices Using Flow Study). J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1409-1420.

Shewan LG, Coats AJS, Henein M. Requirements for ethical publishing in biomedical journals. International Cardiovascular Forum Journal 2015;2:2 DOI: 10.17987/icfj.v2i1.4




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17987/jatamis.v1i0.284

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Yoshishige Kanamori, Fumitsugu Yoshikawa, Ryuichi Aikawa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2518-6140 (on-line version)